Louis Riel Day

Today is Louis Riel Day in Manitoba. It is of course named after that (in)famous Métis leader who defied the Federal Government not once but twice (1870 and 1885).

A few years back, the provincial government decided that it would be nice to commemorate the supposed “Father of Manitoba” by naming a special holiday after him.

I personally object to the identification of Louis Riel as the “Father of Manitoba” for two reasons.

First, if Louis Riel was the “Father of Manitoba”, it was only in an indirect manner. History clearly shows that Prime Minister Macdonald created the Province of Manitoba essentially despite Louis Riel, certainly not according to Louis Riel’s wishes – although a number of expedient concessions were made (at least provisionally). The creation of Manitoba was in fact intended to facilitate the occupation of the territory of the Red River Colony by British Canadians, which is exactly what transpired following the creation of Manitoba. It is interesting to note that Louis Riel was forced to run away from Manitoba only a few years later, even though he had been elected as Member of Parliament.

Second, Louis Riel was clearly a mentally deranged religious fanatic – not exactly a fitting character to be considered the “father” of anything. A few years ago, I read a book by Ismène Toussaint called Louis Riel: Journaux de guerre et de prison. This book contains writings of Louis Riel from the time of the Northwest Rebellion in 1885 and from his subsequent incarceration. These writings certainly do not lend themselves to the portrayal of Louis Riel as a brave hero, but rather as an enormously confused and deluded individual.

Among the many outlandish statements and ideas that Louis Riel recorded is a list of statements beginning with the words “God wants” – always a sure sign that someone doesn’t exactly have his head on straight. These supposed divine requests include the renaming of planets, stars and geographic regions after so-called “saints”, including the “Virgin” Mary and the “Apostles”. Also, the writings of Louis Riel include many “revelations”, these being one indication among others that Louis Riel actually considered himself to be a divinely chosen prophet (lol).

It is well know from other sources that Louis Riel suffered from bouts of depression and insanity (not uncommon among religious fanatics). Undoubtedly, Louis Riel was truly a sick person. He may not have merited death by hanging (although his actions were clearly treasonous), but he certainly belonged in a sanatorium.

I don’t know about you, but I really can’t understand how anybody could look up to an individual who was clearly a mentally deranged religious fanatic – except of course for mentally deranged religious fanatics. But then again, glossing over all the bad details and elaborating on a romantic (albeit false) ideal is a standard part of rewriting history. Modern liberal democracies are all in favor of rewriting history (as Professor Ricardo Duchesne has largely pointed out in recent years) and the modern view of Louis Riel is a case in point. The Louis Riel that people learn about nowadays is an extremely sanitized and absurdly glorified derivative of the real Louis Riel. So people can be forgiven for faithfully believing that Louis Riel was a really, really great guy.

Louis Riel’s fantasy, which was clearly expressed in his writings, was that the area of Manitoba might become a haven of peace and harmony for people from all over the world – a typical fantasy among deranged individuals such as modern liberals. Of course, this fantasy was squarely in opposition to the establishment of British Canadian rule in Manitoba. Allow me to be clear on something: I am completely in favor of the fact that a British Canadian regime was established in Manitoba. To me, there is no question that a British Canadian Manitoba was and still is the ideal Manitoba. I also find it perfectly deplorable that Louis Riel’s deranged fantasy is rapidly coming true now, as Manitoba is increasingly infested by hordes of Third World creatures and consequently losing its ideal British Canadian identity. (I wonder how long it will be before the Union Jack disappears from the provincial flag…)

Louis Riel is a figurehead for the forces of all the Undermen who envy, resent and hate everything that is traditionally European. As such, Louis Riel is just like Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela – two other “great leaders” whose characters and deeds are also very, very questionable (to put it mildly). Of course, all the glorified (i.e. sanctified) heroes of modern liberalism have been warped beings in reality – every_single_one of them.

In conclusion, I will say this: shove your Louis Riel Day where the sun don’t shine. And may Louis Riel rot in Hell.



Nazi Brutes

Every human being is potentially capable of thinking the most treacherous, perverse, depraved, cruel and wicked thoughts, as well as the most beautiful, righteous and benevolent thoughts. This is simply part of being a creature with a highly developed brain.

But only one group of human beings has ever done everything possible to give itself every conceivable justification for acting on all the most treacherous, perverse, depraved, cruel and wicked thoughts. I am, of course, talking about the Jews.

For most of the history of mankind, Tradition existed to keep people on the way of good and right thoughts and deeds, and to keep them from falling towards the evil thoughts that arose in their minds.

But the Chosen of Satan, otherwise known as the Jews, have constantly endeavored, through various means, to undermine Tradition, especially among the European peoples that they envied and resented so much, so that these people might become unable to resist every wicked thought, and might then be made to fall under their wicked power.

Of course, the Jews have always targeted the more gifted people with their anti-Traditional views and ideals. Once suitably corrupted and debauched, the more gifted people become the ideal agents of the anti-Traditional agenda of the Jews due to their influence over common people. The ethical and moral destruction of nations soon follows…

The official narrative about Adolf Hitler, the National Socialists and the German Third Reich that the Jews and their friends have constantly promoted over the past seven decades (and which is at least partly endorsed by members of the “Alt-Right”, by the way) often points to the fact that many prominent artists and academics were strongly opposed to National Socialism.

These artists and academics often characterized the National Socialists as a bunch of stupid brutes. It is not difficult to recognize this as an unfounded slander – a favorite activity of the Jews. In fact, Adolf Hitler was a very intelligent man and many other National Socialists were far from being unintelligent. National Socialism was (and still is) the product of the greatest level of reason and understanding. And this is indeed a reason why it was so hated by the sophisticated and cultured élites of Weimar Germany.

I certainly wouldn’t dispute the fact that the artists and academics who flourished during the Weimar Era were gifted people. At least some of them were, although others were rather more deranged than gifted. Of course, these latter were generally Communists and Jews. But one should wonder what kind of people the seemingly-decent artists and academics really were, and more importantly, what kind of things they did behind the scenes.

It is becoming increasingly evident in recent years that the beloved celebrities that the masses adore so much – including artists and academics as well as politicians and businesspeople – routinely engage in every conceivable form of perversion and debauchery. Many of the things these people regularly indulge in are abhorrent to all good, decent people, and some of them, such as pedophilia, are supposed to be illegal (well, illegal for regular folks anyway).

But the good, decent people certainly won’t find out much if anything about these things from mainstream news. The Harvey Weinstein pseudo-scandal and other pseudo-scandals that have arisen in its wake are nothing but distractions from the seriously evil acts that are commonly perpetrated by celebrities. As if we’re supposed to believe that the worst thing these people do is sexual harassment!

The situation in Weimar Era Germany was the same as it is in our modern times. There is certainly no lack of documentation for the sick and twisted activities that proliferated in Berlin and other German cities between the World Wars. Many if not most artists and academics of the day were clearly in favor of such activities, even if some of them may not have participated in them.

The artists and academics who vehemently denounced Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists were of the type of people who are gifted but perverse, talented but twisted, intelligent but also psychopathic. The same goes for the artists and academics who still badmouth Adolf Hitler and National Socialism today. And this has always been the case with the Jews.

What Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists wished to achieve was the replacement of all gifted sickos and perverts with intelligent and gifted people who were also genuinely healthy and decent. One may wonder at the fact that the side of the sickos and perverts eventually won the war against Adolf Hitler and National Socialism, but as I’ve said before, nothing can truly begin to get better until everything has finished getting worse. That time has yet to come, but it will come.

All Hail the Untermensch!

One of the fundamental goals of modern liberal democracy is to make life as pleasant and comfortable as possible for the weak, the sick, the ugly and the stupid.

This requires that everything be made to suit the weak, the sick, the ugly and the stupid.

It also requires that everyone be made to conform to the weak, the sick, the ugly and the stupid.

The corollary of this is the gradual reduction of everyone to weakness, sickness, ugliness and stupidity.

This necessarily means the eventual elimination of genuine strength, health, beauty and intelligence in the long run.

Could it be more obvious that this is in fact happening, and at an accelerating rate?

But is it any use to think that this tendency might somehow be stopped?

Dream on.

We’re getting quite close to the point where saying “this world is fucked” will be an understatement.

Nothing is getting better until everything has finished getting worse.

But whatever…

God bless Justin Trudeau.


The Capture of Trudeau

CBC News

February 17, 2035


Former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was captured by Canadian National Police yesterday in Montreal. He had been sought for his part in the crimes against the Canadian people that had been perpetrated under his tenure as Prime Minister, particularly his extreme promotion of the policies of multiculturalism and immigration from Third World countries.

Soon after the new National Government of Canada took power last year, the policies of multiculturalism and immigration from Third World countries were officially overturned. Legislation was passed which redefined these policies as criminal offenses against the Canadian people, and which provided for the arrest and prosecution of any individual who actively participated in the establishment and/or promotion of these policies.

It is reported that Trudeau had attempted to flee to another country after the establishment of the National Government. It is also reported that a significant number of other individuals wanted for their part in the newly-defined crimes against the Canadian people have already fled. The National Government has begun to explore possible means of bringing these criminals against Canada to justice.

A spokesman for the National Government, William Towers, lauded the arrest of Trudeau as “an important part of the National Government’s effort to re-establish the Canada that rightfully belongs to the Canadian people”. He promised that the National Government would “certainly carry out the crucial task of eliminating everything that has singularly disadvantaged the Canadian people for so long”.

An official statement by Prime Minister Robert Henry celebrated Trudeau’s capture as “a great victory of the Canadian people against one of its worst enemies” and spoke of an “ongoing commitment by our National Government to right the wrongs of the previous Canadian governments over the past seven decades”.

The leader of the Conservative Party, Waldo S. Doofus, spoke strongly against the capture of Trudeau, saying that “it doesn’t seem right to prosecute individuals for little mistakes they may have made”. He added that he and his fellow MP would speak out in the House of Commons against what he called “a discouraging development”.

The leader of the now-defunct Liberal Party, Miss Pussy Sausage Supreme, angrily denounced the capture of Trudeau, asserting that “even despite the arrest of our great hero Justin Trudeau, we shall certainly continue to pursue our mission of utterly destroying that which was once Canada and those who were once Canadians”. He/she/it insisted that “the future of Canada still belongs to all of the beautiful people of the world – except for straight White people”.

The leader of the now-defunct New Democratic Party, Mbubu Gaga, was able to articulate the NDP’s official statement on Trudeau’s capture by saying “We no like dis”. He also remarked that the official position of the NDP on the National Government was “dem no good, dem bad”.

Trudeau’s trial will be held in April. Although it is most likely that he will be sentenced to life in prison, some say that the newly-reestablished death penalty may be considered.


Related news: Two more anti-Canadian organisations defunded by the National Government


The Great Instauration

When the great collapse finally happened, governments quickly lost all control, energy grids ceased to function altogether and financial systems practically ceased to exist. Non-physical money vanished overnight and physical money became practically worthless.

In the wake of this ultimate catastrophe, all hell broke loose and every danger became real. Anarchy quickly became total; all order in society was quickly forsaken. For most people, especially in the cities, theft and murder became the only means of survival.

Fortunately, some had prepared themselves. While the rest of the world continued to slide into madness and deviance, a few brave men had readied themselves – physically, mentally and spiritually – for the eventual disaster that they could clearly see coming.

Among the men who were well-prepared were members of the police and the army. Purging their ranks of all unsuitable elements, they gathered themselves and other men like them and pooled their resources, thereby forming a most fearsome warrior society.

No longer dependent on corrupt governments or financial interests, these men were free to totally disregard all perverse, liberal sensibilities. Seeing clearly what belonged to them and what did not, they acted for their interests and those of their own people.

In the absence of all governing authorities, these men formed a new government. Unlike the former governments, theirs was a truly strong and proud government. It was a good government that would make things right once again, as they had been a long time ago.

Thoroughly imbued with a Traditional sense of right and wrong, and desiring to establish Traditional law and order, these men set about eliminating all that was contrary to these. Errors that were never corrected through words were now corrected through brave deeds.

The former regime had invited hordes of invaders to settle in our lands. Black and brown beings from the most degenerate places were encouraged to introduce themselves among our people, thereby creating an intolerable mix that only lovers of disorder could want.

The good warriors let all the invaders know that they were no longer welcome and strongly advised them all to leave immediately. Those invaders who refused to heed the warnings of the warriors were not allowed to insist on continuing to live in these lands.

The former regime had also encouraged every kind of filth and abomination to flourish among our people. Not only were moral, behavioral and spiritual diseases protected by law, but these were relentlessly promoted through every form of official propaganda.

The good warriors strongly notified all decadent, deviant and perverse people that they would no longer be tolerated. Many of these immediately fled, but many also tried to hide. It didn’t take long for the good warriors to root them out in order to deal with them.

As the good warriors diligently carried out their work, the good people cheered them on and thanked God for them. The good people could hardly believe that such salvation had truly come at last. Their tears of joy flowed freely as they saluted their excellent saviors.

Having freed their people from these hideous plagues that had long afflicted them, the good warriors turned to the necessity of reforming their own people. They let their people know that their erroneous ideals and misguided behaviors were no longer acceptable.

Men were encouraged to live up to the Traditional ideal of genuine manhood. It was made clear to all men that the image of the soft and amenable cuck would no longer be favored. The ideal of the real man would be upheld over the weak and lazy once again.

Women were advised that they should properly submit to men and relinquish all non-Traditional roles, and that any woman who refused to do so would be treated as a witch. The good and decent Traditional woman was clearly elevated as the feminine ideal.

Adolescents were notified that all instances of juvenile delinquency would bring harsh punishment. For the genuine good of society, the notions of adequately disciplining children and requiring full obedience from them were reintroduced and reestablished.

As they cleansed and reformed our society, our good government was bold, relentless and even merciless. They refused half measures and they rejected sentimental considerations because they understood that compromise is always the first step to evil’s victory.

It was only in this strong and decisive manner that our good government could effectively lay the foundations of the truly excellent nation that we have become. Our good people, our good families and our good communities simply could not exist otherwise.

On the Virtue of Going Wrong

Perhaps Christianity’s most beautiful and wonderful gift to Western Civilization is the lovely and truly heart-warming notion that one can always be redeemed no matter how much one fucks up. This redemptive idea is closely related to the Biblical assertion that human beings are inherently prone to wickedness, i.e. they can’t help but fuck up on a regular basis.

How much closer can one get to saying that it’s okay to go wrong without actually saying that it’s okay to go wrong?

This glorious gem of Christian redemption is obviously at the root of the acceptance of almost every wrongful tendency in our modern liberal democratic society (not pedophilia yet, but we’re getting there). Thanks to the steady erosion and disappearance of Traditional values in the wake of the so-called “Enlightenment”, the full force of that oh-so-forgiving Christian Liberalism has been unleashed in modern times, particularly through Cultural Marxism. Yes, I am saying that Cultural Marxism is a vehicle for the full extension of Christian sensibilities.

The spectacle of extremes and errors increasingly infesting our modern society is a direct consequence of Christianity’s essentially laissez-faire attitudes being fully applied without any Traditional checks and balances. (Having dealt with the essentially anti-Traditional nature of Christianity in a number of previous posts, I will only mention John 8:1-11 here). Thanks to the fully-unfettered notion that one can somehow avoid any consequences of wrongful actions, people feel free to explore every form of deviance and disorder, and are often encouraged to do so by society, because it’s all good.

Don’t worry, be happy.

If it makes you happy, it can’t be that bad.

And remember: God loves you anyway.

One particularly dreadful consequence of this is the all-too-common modern notion that young people need to do all of the wrong things that they want to do, and should be allowed to do them. Somehow, it is believed that people can’t be truly happy or successful in life if they don’t spend their teenage years (and beyond) going wrong in various ways. One might even say that youth is the right time for going wrong. And everybody assumes that dealing (one way or another) with every stupid, wrong and evil thing that one has done in one’s youth is a necessary part of becoming a mature adult.

That’s life, some might say.

Bullshit, I say.

One of the few truly valuable verses in the Hebrew Tanakh (I do not say the “Old Testament”) is Proverbs 13:24 – “Whoever spares the rod hates their children, but the one who loves their children is careful to discipline them.” Most people are more familiar with the related saying “spare the rod and spoil the child”.

One really has to wonder how letting something go wrong can ever be a good idea. Yes, I understand that one has to learn from one’s mistakes sometimes. But this certainly does not mean that one should be allowed to run after mistakes in order to learn from them. How many people can still grasp the fact that doing everything possible to keep something from going wrong is always the best course of action?

“But I love my daughter! I don’t want to hurt her feelings! I just want her to be happy!” Things are bad enough already because of such sentimental excuses, but can you imagine how bad things will get when Traditional values have finally disappeared altogether?

The teenage years are naturally a time of exploring one’s developing abilities and seeking out one’s limits. But this adolescent self-discovery can be in good ways or bad ways. Unfortunately, the bad ways are usually easier and more fun so teenagers will tend to go in the bad ways, and parents who highly value those things which are easier and more fun won’t mind much if their adolescent children go in those directions.

Genuine Tradition is a trustworthy guide to distinguish between good ways and bad ways. As such, it is crucial for the best possible development of a growing individual. Of course, teenagers themselves can’t be expected to understand anything about Tradition, much less apply it to themselves. Therefore, it is absolutely imperative that parents not only acknowledge the sure guidelines of Tradition but apply them faithfully and consistently to their offspring. This requires parents to be fully mature and responsible, and to be able to deal with their offspring in a strong and intelligent manner. How many modern parents are like this?

Another useful verse from the Hebrew Tanakh (not the “Old Testament”) is Ecclesiastes 7:13 – “Consider what God has done: Who can straighten what he has made crooked?” Of course, the notion of God making something crooked is debatable; a variant that might be both more acceptable and more germane to this essay would be “Who can straighten what has grown crooked?”

Letting young people grow crooked virtually guarantees that they will need to straighten themselves out before they can become mature and responsible adults (which doesn’t always happen). Of course, parents who grew up crooked and who have embraced the salvific, life-changing process of becoming mature and responsible adults will be quite comfortable with letting their children follow in their humble footsteps. “We did that and we turned out okay, so why should we try to keep him from doing that?” At least for some of us, turning out okay isn’t quite good enough in the same way that only doing half a job isn’t quite good enough.

Many people do indeed learn to adequately counter the crooked tendencies that they acquired during their youth. But at what cost? These people have largely wasted their formative years, so living up to their full potential involves more catching up than most people are capable of. But then again, most people apparently don’t mind being much less than they can be. And some people spend the rest of their lives constantly dealing with something that they shouldn’t necessarily have to deal with – because of the vain follies of an unrestrained youth. Wouldn’t life be better if people didn’t give themselves problems to deal with in the first place? Oh, but of course, people are suckers for salvation, and one can’t be saved without getting oneself into trouble first, right?

Many might say that they have successfully dealt with the errors and wrongs of their youth, either through religion or through modern substitutes for religion, such as therapy and counselling. I’m not so sure; self-deception can be a very pretty mask but it doesn’t fool me. I’ve seen enough to know that there are a lot of crooked people in certain churches and other respectable milieus that don’t genuinely straighten out any more than crooked trees or crooked bones, and I certainly don’t believe in miracles.

A young person being raised properly with proper discipline simply won’t have to deal with any skeletons in the closet, any ghosts from the past, any regrettable consequences of youthful fancies and frivolity. Such a person may not be the happiest or most fun person around, but he or she will be decent, respectable and confident. Ideally, he or she will always grow up to be the best person that he or she can be.

Of course, one might say that depends on what is meant by “the best”. Opinions on this may well differ, but my view of what is best is decidedly Traditional. That which is best is that which truly contributes the most to the genuine welfare of a well-organized and properly functioning Traditional society. It certainly has little if anything to do with those things which most characterize modern liberal democratic society, such as love, pleasure and entertainment.

Canada? No thanks.

I was born a Canadian citizen. This means that I can claim to belong to a geo-political abstraction that is exclusively civic and decidedly un-ethnic in nature, an all-inclusive collectivity that has no genuine identity whatsoever beyond the lowest common denominator (i.e. that most generic and base ideal of simply being a human being). I have no interest whatsoever in associating myself with such a meaningless thing.

As a Canadian citizen, I have the option of embracing every so-called “progressive” ideal and rejecting every traditional norm, thereby becoming an acceptable, adequately virtue-signaling member of modern Canadian society. If I had it in me, I could join the modern Canadian fantasy quest to create the kind of paradise on earth that the corrupt, the incompetent, the deviant and the revolting dream about. Thankfully, there is something good and right in me that finds this possibility utterly loathsome and practically unthinkable.

The Canadian state has become a most unnatural artifice in my lifetime. Rather than remaining the normal ethnically and morally coherent community that it was, Canada has been transformed into a mongrelized monstrosity that can only be considered abnormal by all the standards of natural reality. The nation of my proud, decent, hard-working forefathers has been mutated into a liberal haven for all the primitives, degenerates and perverts who profoundly despise my forefathers and everything they believed in and cherished. What was once a nation in which freedom was properly defined and circumscribed has become a sanctuary for vile freeloaders and every kind of free-living freak. And so I choose not to identify myself as a Canadian citizen.

A few months ago, I took a DNA ancestry test from 23andme.com. The results indicate that I am genetically 100% European. Fully three-quarters of my genetic ancestry is of Northwestern European origin (France, Germany, the Low Countries, the British Isles). The Y-DNA haplogroup (paternal lineage) that I belong to is R1b-L21, commonly identified as “Celtic”, which is most prevalent in Ireland, very common in Western and Northern Britain and also commonly found in Western France (my patrilineal ancestor came from the French province of Poitou). The mtDNA haplogroup (maternal lineage) that I belong to is K1a4a1. This (non-Jewish) haplogroup is common throughout Europe; it is thought that it spread throughout Europe from the Middle East with the spread of agriculture, especially during the expansion of the LBK Culture during the Neolithic.

Some people might think that I would base my identity on my genetic ancestry. Not so. Knowing my genetic ancestry only confirms my identity as I already understand it. My natural propensity to relate most satisfactorily with people of European ancestry, particularly Northwestern European ancestry, is supported by the fact that I am most closely related to such people genetically. Normal human beings, like all normal creatures, will instinctively tend to associate with those of their own kind. Many people in this modern age, particularly the devotees of the modern diversity mantra, are clearly abnormal inasmuch as they blindly accept multifarious associations with people who are visibly unlike them. The fact that so many people in this modern age so blatantly lack the natural and normal instinct to associate with their own kind is clearly a result of unnatural conditioning.

Of course, the reasons for associating with others are not merely genetic. It is cultural identity that draws people together, a cultural identity being a product of a common culture. But there are cultures that are natural because they are founded on and derive from a shared ancestry, and some cultures (especially in this modern world) that are unnatural because they lack any common ancestral foundation. Natural cultures that normally develop among people with shared genetic ancestry are coherent and homogenous cultures that tend to be stable and enduring, whereas people with many differing genetic ancestries can only produce vain and ephemeral unnatural cultures characterized by artificially derived and abnormally juxtaposed elements.

It should be noted that successful junctions of two genetically and culturally distinct populations are evidently possible, as is the case with the Metis. The resulting syncretized culture must necessarily be somewhat eclectic and marginal at first but may eventually develop into a strong and viable culture over time and under favorable conditions. But beyond the pairing of two peoples, there certainly is no possibility whatsoever of any viable culture being produced by the fusion of many radically distinct cultures. Such mixed-up populations must always be devoid of any real, truly meaningful culture, and will always be characterized by a measure of cultural segregation along with a measure of cultural extinction.

In recent years, someone (that I shall not deign to name) famously called this modern Canada a “post-national state”. This is practically saying that there is no Canadian nation, and this effectively means that there can be no such thing as a genuine Canadian identity. Any kind of identity associated with a state that is not a nation must necessarily be artificial, vain and inherently false. The multicultural collectivity that Canada is rapidly being turned into will never be anything more than a multicultural collectivity, and this is truly a sorry excuse for a people.

Today is Canada Day. In fact, today is the 150th anniversary of the creation of the Dominion of Canada. Writing this article is the only thing that I will do to commemorate this particular anniversary. I certainly won’t be celebrating. I can’t even remember the last time I did anything at all to celebrate Canada Day. I simply don’t see any good reason to celebrate a profoundly unnatural and increasingly abnormal entity such as this modern Canada. To be quite honest, I’m rather looking forward to seeing the end of it. Now that will be something to celebrate!


What We Believe

We are truly ourselves and we know who we really are. We are in full possession of our own identity and we fully intend to keep it. We are a White European people. We are a Traditional people. We are an excellent and proud people. We are an Aryan people.

No one can lead us to believe that this is wrong. No one can make us think that we should be ashamed of this. Those who would have us believe that we are wrong, those who would make us think that we should be ashamed, they are the ones who are wrong and who should be ashamed. These are the weak, the stupid and the ugly. They are the resentful and the envious. They are the decadent and the perverse.

Here are some of the positions we take on various things.

We do not call ourselves a “tribe” because this term carries the connotation of a primitive people. We are not a tribe of primitive people who cover their bodies with tattoos and piercings, and who enjoy mindless entertainment, and whose greatest ideal is to experience pleasure liberally. Although primitive people are not necessarily immoral, they are certainly morally inferior. In every possible way, we strive towards the highest ideals of all great civilizations. We honor order, justice and truth above all and in all ways. We are thus a nation of civilized people.

Similarly, we reject the term “pagan” to describe our religious views because this term denotes a primitive stage of religious thought, one that relies heavily on superstition, trickery and fantasy. Our religion is a philosophical one based on a rational appraisal of natural reality, a true religion of the mind that accepts the findings of scientific inquiry and that rejects all deception, illusion and falsehood.

We strongly oppose multiculturalism. We do not hate other races or ethnic groups, but we are opposed to people of other races and ethnic groups infesting our lands like so many parasitic vermin. We strongly believe that it is only natural for an ethnic group to keep all other ethnic groups out of its territory. Moreover, we recognize that the best, the most ideal and the most natural societies are those that are most racially and ethnically homogenous, and that societal dysfunction always accompanies the mixing of different races and ethnic groups.

This being said, we are not opposed to the outright conquest of one ethnic group’s territory by another ethnic group. But we recognize that the conquering ethnic group should ideally expel the conquered ethnic group from the conquered territory (unless the conquered ethnic group is a closely related one that can easily be assimilated). We strongly disagree with the creation of “Indian Reservations” and “Bantustans” as well as the policy of segregation because these invariably cause serious problems sooner or later.

We strongly oppose religious pluralism. We believe that it is not natural or normal for more than one religion to be practiced within one nation. The potential for schisms, factions and civil war in a pluralistic community is obvious. Ideally, we believe that all nations should only tolerate either their own religions or autonomous denominations of some supranational religion.

We disagree with the concept of the “separation of church and state”. We believe that a nation’s state and a nation’s religion should be distinct, but that they should collaborate towards their common goal of the nation’s genuine welfare. In effect, we see both the state and religion as equal partners in good government.

We are opposed to the Jews for the simple reason that the Jews have always been opposed to us. It is not difficult to see – even despite all the specious rhetoric and dissembling – that the soul of the Jew is dead set on our elimination. It seems that only the sheer imbecility of the masses keeps them from acknowledging the massive weight of evidence pointing to the truly nefarious nature and purpose of the self-styled “Chosen Ones”.

Likewise, we are opposed to the State of Israel – truly a thorn in the world’s side – and we would be quite satisfied if Israel could disappear from the face of the Earth. Yet, we have no love for the Palestinians either, so we don’t care much about them being mistreated and massacred by Israel. We regard the so-called “Holy Land” as a most unholy land and we understand Jerusalem to be a most wicked place. If this particular region could somehow sink beneath the sea altogether, we would be very pleased.

We are also opposed to the Muslims for essentially the same reason that we are opposed to the Jews. It could hardly be more obvious – even despite all the specious rhetoric and dissembling – that Muslims are fundamentally opposed to us and would do anything to bring about our elimination. We certainly are not fooled by the extremely absurd claim that Islam is a religion of peace. We sincerely believe that Islam should be confined to the Arabian Peninsula and we look forward to that eventuality.

We admit that Jews and Muslims are not entirely detestable, both having some admirable qualities, even though they both are clearly our enemies. We also recognize that there is widespread collaboration between Jews and Muslims in their efforts against us.

We are opposed to the Primitive Christianity that is revealed in the New Testament. We recognize that this Primitive Christianity is a faith for weak, stupid, resentful and envious beings, and we see it as the common origin of Socialism, Communism, Cultural Marxism, Modern Liberalism and the Social Justice Warrior phenomenon. We reject all such ideologies – including Primitive Christianity – which demand that we tolerate what we should not tolerate, that we accept what we should not accept and that we embrace what we should not embrace.

We recognize that what is called “European Christendom” is nothing but European Tradition under a superficial Christian appearance. We understand that the traditions of the pre-Christian Romans, Greeks and Germanic peoples were synthesized in the early Middle Ages to form a European Tradition. And we understand that everything excellent about Europe over the past two thousand years has been due to this European Tradition, and that none of this excellence was particularly due to Christianity.

We believe that freedom of speech should certainly not be unconditional. We accept that people should always be allowed to speak their minds, but we sincerely disagree with the idea that this should never entail certain consequences. People who speak in favor of anything demonstrably false, perverse or detrimental to society should by all means be silenced – and this is obviously the case with Leftists in general. The simple and undeniable fact is that allowing everyone to speak freely with impunity guarantees a platform to every smooth-talking deceiver and persuasive demagogue whose true desire is to contribute to the gradual destruction of everything that is truly good and right in society. We certainly do not underestimate the propensity of the average person to be utterly deceived. In an ideal world as we understand it, any abuse of freedom of speech would never be tolerated.

We oppose democracy. We do not believe that the will of the people should guide a country. We see clearly that the “rule of the people” has meant a gradual decline in everything that is truly good and right in society. It seems that the very concept of democracy allows for the progressive infestation of every conceivable moral evil, mental illness and social wrong. Moreover, we recognize that most modern democratic leaders are charlatans and conmen who try to do the will of the globalist élite that they belong to, even despite the will of the people, and usually get away with it. We would favor the establishment of a traditionally aristocratic form of government, whether it be a monarchy or a republic, headed by a strong, no-nonsense, traditional leader.

We oppose the notion of egalitarianism. Anyone with a good mind can see that there are always greater and lesser members in any natural group, and that the greater members naturally contribute more to the group and therefore enjoy greater advantages and benefits than the others. Our powers of reasoning are quite sound, so we are not deluded by the outrageous idea that everyone is equal. We understand that it is naturally right that a few better people deserve more while the common masses can and should make do with less (which doesn’t necessarily mean not enough).

We are also against the notion of human rights. To claim that rights are inherent in a being is an egregious misunderstanding of what rights are. Being a human being does not endow a human being with any human rights, not any more than being a badger endows a badger with badger rights, or being a chrysanthemum endows a chrysanthemum with chrysanthemum rights. A person may be given rights by virtue of belonging to a particular group, or may acquire them through merit, but the idea that merely existing as a human being automatically means having rights is simply absurd. Of course, we understand that the intent of the doctrine of human rights is to serve as a justification of everything wrong in this modern liberal democratic world, from the massive immigration of non-White Third World people into White countries to allowing transgender freaks to use women’s washrooms.

We understand that globalization is inevitable and we appreciate at least some of its benefits, such as the ease of travelling to foreign countries, being able to buy ethnic foods at the local supermarket or having the ability to learn about everything that exists in the world, including other peoples and cultures. But we are strongly opposed to globalism (aka the “New World Order”), this being the tendency to eliminate all differences (including ethnic and cultural differences), to standardize everything everywhere and to create one global system ruling over one monotypic human race. We are not in favor of any globalist institutions, including the United Nations, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the European Union, etc. We believe the world would be better off without all these.

We oppose capitalism. We understand that all excessive creation and accumulation of wealth is not only unnecessary but detrimental, and we see clearly that this unnatural obsession with wealth and prosperity effectively trumps all considerations of a natural order (such as family, culture and race). We believe in having enough plus a bit more in case of unforeseen contingencies, and being happy with that.

Moreover, we believe that capitalism is the essence of that which is truly the Right, and that this true Right is just as destructive as the Left. We see clearly how this true Right effectively collaborates with the Left to bring about the destruction of all that is good, right and true. We are certainly not on the Right any more than the Left. Neither are we in the Center where the common masses dwell, constantly subjected to the detrimental influences and activities of both the Right and the Left. We actually do have the audacity to claim that we tend to be over and above the Right, the Left and the Center. Inasmuch as it is possible for us, we profoundly wish to be a superior people. And we understand that the genuine essence of Tradition is precisely this – to elevate a people ever higher towards that which truly is best.

We do not oppose technology, although we find that much modern technology is unnecessary to us. We can appreciate the claim that technology can make our lives easier, but we do not believe that this generally means making our lives better. It is obvious that the excessive use of technology is detrimental, but this is due to a lack of discipline rather than the existence of technology. Quite unfortunately, a lack of discipline is one of the most serious problems in our modern liberal democratic world.

We love the strong, the intelligent and the beautiful. We have no love for the weak, the stupid and the ugly. We refuse to believe that this is wrong because we know that strength, intelligence and beauty are the genuine values of the best. We hold these values as the standards for all art. Any art form that lacks natural strength, natural intelligence or natural beauty fails to live up to our standards, and we strongly reject anything that might be called “art” but that displays weakness, stupidity or ugliness. Needless to say that we despise most modern art.

As for modern entertainment, we couldn’t care less about spectator sports, we don’t care much about television, we don’t watch many movies, and we generally despise fiction. We generally hold the view that life is much better spent doing things rather than watching or otherwise consuming things. Moreover, we believe that entertainment should only be part of something greater and more important, such as a festival or a family gathering. We are decidedly not part of the modern consumer society in which entertainment has become a spectacular yet mundane substitute for living.

We are not opposed to the use of alcohol or marijuana, but we strongly believe that these should always be used moderately. Of course, we oppose the use of harder, more dangerous drugs. Again, that passé notion of discipline is important here, as it is with the consumption of anything. We certainly are not in favor of any governmental authority legally banning the use of any substance. Banning the use of any substance evidently fails to eliminate the use because the real problem – lack of discipline – is not being addressed.

We are strongly opposed to pornography and sexual promiscuity. The liberalization of sexuality is a strong symptom of a degenerating culture, and the detrimental effects of “sexual liberation” on relationships and self-perception are not exactly unknown. We strongly believe that sexuality always should be a private matter that normally should be shared between a man and a woman in the context of an intimate relationship. Here too, mention should be made of the necessity of discipline.

We are anti-gay, anti-trans, anti-queer – in short, we are opposed to the entire LGBTQ community. We recognize all forms of gender/sexual deviance as being serious disorders, and we strongly believe that they should all be treated as such. We are in favor of removing all gender/sexual deviants from society because we do not believe that such deviants can successfully be cured. We are also of the view that pedophiles and practitioners of bestiality should simply be eliminated.

We are anti-feminist. We hold that it is simply wrong for women to assert themselves against men, or to try to make themselves equal to men. It is unnatural for a woman to try to be essentially a man, just as it is unnatural for a man to try to be essentially a woman. We honor and cherish women who naturally behave as good women should behave, as traditional women have always behaved. We recognize that the greatest excellence of a woman is to be a good wife and mother.

It is our sincere hope, our blessed hope, that the forces that encourage and sustain all these things that we disagree with, that we oppose and that we reject will soon be defeated. We have much reason to be hopeful because more and more people are coming around to our views, slowly but surely, and more and more of them are voicing them along with us.

Even though things continue to worsen around us, we can already see that the end of the worsening is near. As I’ve said before, it is darkest before the dawn. The bloated vainglorious monstrosity which is this modern liberal democratic world is bound to collapse before very long.

We know that we are right because we are on the side of what is truly good and genuinely true. Regardless of all false appearances and misleading sentiments, we can faithfully cling to the traditional values that we hold dear and look forward to our eventual vindication.


I Really Like People But…

Although democracy is an illusion and a fraud, it does at least lead the people to believe that their views and beliefs are somehow important. The people in general are not especially intelligent; how much the people can genuinely understand is significantly limited. Therefore, the facts and ideas that the people will genuinely understand and will therefore espouse are relatively simple and primitive, and any kind of argument or exposition of facts that surpasses their level of intelligence they feel they can safely consider unimportant to them and consequently disregard.

This is an important point that most right-wing intellectuals apparently fail to comprehend. The strength of all their intelligent arguments and explanations is seriously diminished by the democratic ideal. All their mental efforts to persuade the people intelligently and rationally about anything are truly in vain as long as unintelligent and irrational alternative views and ideas remain in vogue. If the people are given the choice between believing the leftist guru’s sophistic ranting which is largely sentiment-based and sorely lacking in genuine facts, or the right-wing intellectual’s intelligent and rational exposition of the truth, the people will invariably tend to believe the former and will easily be led to condemn the latter as if it were false, even wrong.

Whatever the people believe (or whatever they’ve been led to believe) tends to be based on sentiment rather than intelligence, and their sentiment-based beliefs determine how they understand things (i.e. how they interpret knowledge). This contrasts with the intelligent man in whom understanding results from a rational appraisal of knowledge; sentiments and beliefs are relegated to a subordinate position in the intelligent mind.

If the teachings of modern leftism appeal so much to the general public, it is obviously due to the fact that these teachings are an essentially unintelligent (although perhaps sophisticated) misrepresentation of knowledge. By making knowledge (either true or false) conform to the sentimental prejudices of the people, leftist ideological movements like Cultural Marxism can easily make the people believe that their relatively unintelligent views and beliefs are not only reasonable but justified. This is something that no one in a right-wing movement can ever really do (and few if any would even think of doing such a thing).

What has just been said with reference to Cultural Marxism can also be said about the Primitive Christianity that gradually infested the Roman Empire in Antiquity. I’ve talked enough about this in previous posts. Also related to this is the Global Warming/Climate Change hoax, which is routinely touted as real science based on facts, but that wouldn’t even be possible without that deeply-instilled age-old Judaeo-Christian belief that human beings are inherently sinful. Once again, leftists can easily use and misuse knowledge to make the people believe all kinds of lies, whereas those on the right are doomed to failure if they insist on trying to make the people understand the truth. It just ain’t gonna happen…

History amply shows that demagogues are always much more successful at misleading the people than sages in rightly leading the people (at least in the context of civilized societies). The establishment of democracy in the modern era has only made this even more so. Along with greater access to knowledge among the general population there has been a greater possibility of knowledge being misunderstood and misinterpreted. The people in this modern democratic world have much more knowledge than their ancestors did but not any more intelligence. For all they know, they still fail to understand. In fact, it may honestly be said that they misunderstand much more than any of their ancestors ever did.

Based on a good number of statements that I’ve made about people in general in various posts on this blog, some people may think that I tend to be too mean towards the people. But reality is reality and facts are facts, and the real fact of the matter with respect to what I’m saying here is that the people in general will never voluntarily agree with the truthful positions of any genuine right-wing movement for the simple reason that it is categorically impossible for them to do so. The best that can be hoped for is that the people might somehow be led to accept these truthful positions even though they can neither truly understand them nor honestly believe in them. And this can certainly never be achieved in a democracy.