The Reality-Denial of Fundamental Christianity

At the very foundation of Christianity is the belief that what is best for the human soul is not life in this world, but life in another world above and beyond this one. The ultimate goal of the Christian is to somehow attain to that other world which is far better than this one in every conceivable respect.

Another way of saying this is that the Christian believes that there is something above and beyond reality that is better than reality.

Christianity is essentially a glorified form of escapism. As I’ve written before, the earliest Christians were resentful and envious inferior types who just couldn’t live with the fact that there were better people in the world – successful, powerful and gifted people – who rightfully ruled over them.

Consumed by an overwhelming spite for all the better people of the world, they dreamed up a fantastic idea according to which they could actually seem to be even better than the better people of the world. They imagined that there was another reality above and beyond this reality, and that only those who believed in it could ever live in it. They preached that it was possible to be even better than the successful, the powerful and the gifted, and that one only had to have faith in order to be better than all the better people of the world.

In this way, the earliest Christians turned their profound disdain for reality into an utter denial of reality which was accompanied by an absurd tendency to believe in any miracle, no matter how unbelievable.

Armed with their sanctimonious belief system that squarely defied reality, these early Fundamentalist Christians found the courage to blatantly oppose all who were truly better than they were and to disparage everything that was truly noble and glorious. Having no regard for reality, they had no problem with the prospect of being violently expelled from reality by the sword, by the cross or by the lions in the Circus Maximus.

By the way, I find it interesting that a total disregard for reality can be considered courageous rather than insane.

Of course, the early Fundamentalist Christians couldn’t care less about attaining to any degree of real success in this world, or about obtaining any real wealth in this world, or about wielding any real power in this world. All of this was beneath them, their sights being squarely fixed on that which is above and beyond anything that could ever be gained in reality. They could insist that they were not at all hopeless defeatists by claiming that they would eventually have everything that was better than the best in the end.

Thankfully, the reality-denial of the early Fundamentalist Christians – and their absurd religious superiority complex accompanying it – never prevailed outside of their primitive Christian communities. By the third century AD, the demented extremism of Christian Fundamentalism was largely mitigated by forces of reality that would not be denied, including not only the sage policy of persecution by the Roman authorities, but more importantly by the sheer resilience of a sane and sound, reality-accepting European Tradition.

Unlike the reality-denying Christian Fundamentalists, European Traditionalists had always retained a good grasp on reality. Rather than obsessing endlessly over a world above and beyond this reality and essentially disregarding the reality of this world, the noble European was encouraged by his Tradition to aim to attain to that which was the best possible in this world, i.e. within the realm of reality. This is the essence of what is called the Faustian spirit of European man. It is a spirit that wants to become the master of reality as much as possible rather than despising this reality and hoping and praying to leave it in order to live in an unreal fantasy world.

After the Christian religion became an accepted (and eventually official) part of the reality of the Roman Empire, the Fundamentalist Christian rejection of reality took a back seat to a much saner view of existence. Most Christians were now decent people who accepted reality in this world as it really was rather than obsessing about a world that was above and beyond reality, although fantasizing about this other world was never entirely given up, especially among extremists such as Christian priests, monks and missionaries.

As long as the reality-accepting European Tradition has endured (even if under the name of Christianity), the better men among Europeans have continued always to strive for that which was best in this world, in this reality. This is why Europeans have excelled at everything that they have ever done. Important scientific advances, glorious architecture such as the Gothic cathedrals, great works of art and music, philosophical and intellectual genius, discovering the entire world and conquering most of it – all of this is due to European Tradition; none of it is due to Christian Fundamentalism. Europeans certainly would not have produced any such excellence if Christianity had truly prevailed over Europe.

Unfortunately, a new form of Fundamentalism has prevailed over Europeans in recent times; perhaps it could be called Leftist Fundamentalism. Unlike Christian Fundamentalism, this Leftist Fundamentalism doesn’t preach the “pie in the sky” belief of a world above and beyond this one. But it does share the same profound disdain for the reality of this world as it really is and this comes from the same profound resentment and envy of inferior types (Stoddard’s “Underman”) that gave rise to Christian Fundamentalism.

Taking Care of Business

During the American presidential campaign and since the election of Donald Trump, it has often been mentioned that Donald Trump has practically no political experience. Unlike many, I don’t view this as a problem at all. In fact, this is a good thing.

The fact that Donald Trump is a successful businessman rather than a career politician will be a defining aspect of his presidency and will undoubtedly have a beneficial effect on America over the next four to eight years.

It has been suggested that Donald Trump will run the American government as his own business. This may be a horrifying prospect to a lot of people, but this is due to a profound lack of understanding of the natural realities of good government and good leadership.

In chapter four (“Incentives in Democracy”) of his excellent book A Critique of Democracy: A Guide for Neoreactionaries, Michael Anissimov explains that a private government is naturally the right form of government, while a public government is quite simply a wrong form of government. Whereas a public government will always tend inexorably towards political, economic, social and cultural decline (even despite all machinations and artifices designed to counter such declines), a private government is naturally suited to produce real, sustained progress in every aspect of a country’s being.

The gist of this is that a private government is owned by the man who leads it, rather than being managed by someone on someone else’s behalf as is the case in public government. If the leader of a country is also its owner, that leader will naturally have a personal stake in its governance, and will naturally want to do what is necessary for the genuine wellbeing of his country.

A man who runs a successful business will not only focus on increasing his profits, but will also pay close attention to the proper management of his business and take proper care of all the people who work for it. He will naturally have a long-range view of things insofar as they concern his business as they also concern him and those who belong to him. By contrast, a manager may not personally care about the proper functioning of the business he works for, nor for the wellbeing of the employees under him. The only thing that really matters for him is getting his paycheck. Even if the business goes under, he can always just find another job.

The people who have led America over the past few decades (both Republicans and Democrats) have functioned as (mis)managers of America. Although they have presumably (mis)managed America on behalf of the American people, there is the real possibility that it is actually on behalf of (((a certain group of people))) (in which case, democracy is quite simply a deception). In either case, the people who have led America (and all other Western states) in the recent past have obviously had little real concern for the best management of their countries and the genuine wellbeing of their fellow citizens. I won’t bother listing all the ways that this is evident; President-elect Trump has pointed this out well enough over the past several months.

Many have remarked that elected officials in a democracy who are elected to limited terms will naturally tend to prioritize short-range concerns (such as getting re-elected) that are of little importance to the long-term wellbeing of the nation. This being said, it wouldn’t be true to say that elected officials won’t pay attention to any long-range concerns. But the long-range concerns that they work for are never in the best interests of the country or of its citizens. Again, whether they are acting as managers for “the people” or as managers for ((((someone else))), the best possible condition of the country and that which is genuinely best for its citizens is not their foremost consideration.

It has been suggested by some that “the people” simply can’t understand political and economic affairs on a national level well enough to make good decisions about them (“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.” – Winston Churchill). This to me is obviously true, and is an important reason why public government (as in a democracy) can never really lead to the proper functioning of a country and the genuine wellbeing of its citizens.

The idea of a private government in which a leader is the owner of his country is reflected famously in the line attributed to French king Louis XIV: “L’état, c’est moi!” (“I am the state”). Like all absolute monarchs, Louis XIV considered his country as his own personal possession. He therefore had a vested interest in the growth and prosperity of his country, and the historical record clearly shows that he backed many economic initiatives that aimed to benefit his country (Louis XIV and Twenty Million Frenchmen by Pierre Goubert is an interesting read). Unfortunately, he had to compete with the much more dynamic economies of some of his neighbours such as Great Britain. And perhaps more importantly, his lust for glory and fame led him to provoke numerous wars during his reign that could only have a net detrimental effect on the wellbeing of France (this often being cited as an immediate factor leading to that most disastrous calamity called the French Revolution).

Some may compare Donald Trump with all the other wealthy élites who are routinely pointed out as extremely wicked people who enrich themselves at the people’s expense, who engage freely in corruption, bribery and fraud, and who thereby contribute to the growing destitution and despair of the people. I don’t believe this comparison holds. Not all successful businessmen are such wicked people, although some of them certainly are – especially those who belong to (((a certain group))).

Donald Trump has repeatedly demonstrated – especially through his speeches and interviews – that he understands that treating people fairly and decently is a crucial part of doing business. Accusations of him defrauding people undoubtedly come from the incompetent and the careless who didn’t deserve any pay or remuneration that they would have received if they had done their jobs properly.

Donald Trump is a strong, intelligent, no-nonsense kind of guy. He knows how to make good business decisions and he has the guts to stick to them. He knows that running a good business depends on keeping good people and getting rid of bad people. He is not afraid to do what it takes to make his business succeed and he won’t be bullied by people whose interests don’t correspond with his own. This is why the current American establishment hates Donald Trump so much. And this is why Donald Trump will Make America Great Again.

[Important note: (((The people who control the economy))) are all still in place. If they decide to crash the economy, there’s nothing Donald Trump can do about it. At least some economists are saying that a major economic event is just around the corner, maybe far worse than 2008. (((The people who control the economy))) have done this kind of thing many times before (in 1933, for example); there’s no reason that they wouldn’t do it again, especially soon after Trump’s victory.]

The Truth about Jesus Christ

The following are some arguments that suggest that Jesus Christ is not at all what he is said to be by those who believe in him. Much of Christian teaching is doublespeak and doublethink, and this is nowhere more so than in the Gospels which present the story and teachings of Jesus Christ. It is important to bear in mind that one may say one thing and at the same time suggest something quite opposite to what one is saying. There is an art to this type of deception (well known to the Jews), in which the real message that one wishes to convey is presented surreptitiously beneath a cover of superficial and even illusory statements…

Jesus loves whores (John 8:1-11 “he who among you is without sin”)

Mary Magdalene is prominent in the Gospel because she was Jesus’ favorite whore. The “woman caught in adultery” in John 8:1-11 has often been identified as Mary Magdalene. This passage teaches that no one should ever judge others, which means that every kind of sin is to be allowed. When Jesus says “go and sin no more”, what he really means is “from now on, don’t think of your sin as being sin”.

There are a number of passages in the Gospels where female followers of Jesus are mentioned by name, such as Luke 8:1-3. These women are said to have been “cured of evil spirits and infirmities”, which could well be a euphemistic way of saying that they had been “liberated” by Jesus. Luke 8:3 says that these women provided for Jesus and his apostles “out of their resources”; a likely explanation for this is that these experienced women freely gave their sexual services to Jesus and his apostles.

The Gospels say that Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary by the Holy Spirit of God. It’s a nice story, but it’s clearly a fiction. In fact, what is much more likely is that Jesus’ mother Mary was quite the opposite of a chaste maiden. I’m certainly not the first to suggest that Jesus was the bastard son of a whore.

Jesus loves queers

Jesus was a bisexual hedonist. The fact that Jesus never had a regular relationship with a woman is fairly indicative. As well as regularly enjoying the services of his favorite whore, Mary Magdalene, Jesus was regularly intimate with his favorite disciple John (“the disciple whom Jesus loved”).

In chapter 96 of Pistis Sophia, John is called “the virgin” (in this particular passage, both Mary Magdalene and John the virgin are said to be above all other disciples). It is unusual that a man be called a virgin. This appellation apparently indicates that John never had sex with a woman; he therefore was a virgin as far as women are concerned, but this wouldn’t necessarily exclude a homoerotic relationship. The Ancient Greek practice of pederasty was certainly not unknown among Jews like Jesus and his followers who rejected the strictures of Judaism.

It is interesting to note the term “Uranian” in connection to gender deviance and homosexuality. This use of a term meaning “heavenly” in relation to deviant sexual behavior casts a suggestive light on the pervasive emphasis in Christian scriptures on all that is “heavenly” (and the corresponding rejection of all that is “worldly” or “secular”, i.e. natural and normal).

Jesus is a proponent of victimization

Jesus wants you to let yourself be abused (“turn the other cheek” – Matthew 5:39) and even to rejoice in being abused (“blessed are you when they persecute you” – Matthew 5:11). Using victimhood as a means of morally elevating oneself above others is a well-known tactic among modern liberals (“Black Lives Matter”, for example); it is also one of the foremost strategies used by Jews throughout history (and exploited to the full in the enormous hoax called the “Holocaust”).

Jesus wants you to disadvantage yourself by giving more than necessary. In 5:40-41, Jesus says “if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well; and if someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two”. Note the terms “sue” and “forces”, both of which suggest coercion or compulsion. This clearly means that people should allow others to coerce or compel them to do what they don’t want to do, which effectively encourages wrongdoers rather than opposing them.

Jesus is an arrogant hypocrite (John 12:1-8)

When “some woman” anoints Jesus with expensive nard, Judas rightly points out the inappropriate nature of the act. (Queer John’s assertion that Judas was a thief is obviously an unsupported slander.) It is generally admitted that Jesus was right to justify this act because he was the Son of God, but in fact he simply felt that he deserved to receive special treatment for no good reason (i.e. that he was entitled to special treatment).

Jesus approves of feminism and is against traditional gender roles (Luke 10:38-42)

When Martha complains to Jesus that her sister Mary should perform her womanly duties, Jesus justifies Mary. This signifies that Jesus prefers that women should shun their traditional womanly duties.

Jesus is in favor of disregarding natural family relations (Matthew 12:46-50)

When Jesus’ mother and brothers wish to speak to him, Jesus refuses to see them, essentially saying that they are not righteous enough to be his family. This is a clear rejection of natural family relations. In Mark 13:12, Jesus says “Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child. Children will rise against their parents and have them put to death.” The fact of the matter is that those who are here portrayed as being betrayed are the ones who betrayed their own families, and their own traditions as well. This is an obvious instance of the culprit calling himself the victim – a classic Jewish tactic.

Jesus is an agent of division (Luke 12:51-53)

Jesus says that he has not come to bring peace, but a sword (Matthew 10:34). Christian apologists insist that the division wrought by Jesus is between the good and the evil, between the righteous and the wrongdoers, but this is a false interpretation. The division that Jesus really intends to bring about is between those who hold to natural and traditional hierarchies, social structures, gender roles, and ethnic and racial distinctions, and those who reject them due to envy, resentment and spite. The subversive mission of Jesus and his followers has always been to destroy natural and traditional social groups by introducing unnatural concepts and deceptive ideas to divide their members.

Jesus is anti-authoritarian (Matthew 20:25-26)

A big part of Jesus’ mission consisted of challenging and defying traditional authorities and hierarchies. In the passage cited above, Jesus tells his followers that they should not recognize any rulers at all. This is in line with his admonition not to call anyone “father” except for God. It is also perfectly in line with the modern liberal notion of equality (or egalitarianism) as well as the fundamental ideal of Communism.

Jesus Christ is truly evil

In the foregoing, I have treated Jesus and his story as historical. But I don’t believe that Jesus existed as a historical person at all. Visit Kenneth Humphreys’ excellent site for all the information that clearly shows that all New Testament history is nothing but fiction.

Yet, the myth of Jesus Christ has been very real for the past two millennia, and that myth has to be dealt with as a real historical phenomenon. Not only are the teachings of Jesus full of deception and lies, but the very way that Jesus has been depicted is also a work of deception and lies.

Jesus Christ has always been presented as a lovely, wonderful and righteous preacher who only wanted what was best for everyone and who wanted to save the world. But his teachings and his influence are all about disrupting natural and normal relationships and structures in order to “liberate” every kind of vile and base being. He is essentially opposed to all who are truly better human beings and on the side of those resentful and spiteful types who despise those who are truly better.

What I have presented above is the way Jesus Christ truly should be depicted according to the real nature of his teachings: as a subversive deviant who endeavors to disrupt and to destroy the natural and normal way of things. As I’ve indicated in a previous essay, Jesus Christ truly is the prototype of all modern liberal SJW’s who are possessed with an infernal obsession to annihilate everything which is normal, natural and traditional.

Jesus Christ is really the godfather of everything which threatens that which is good and right in human society. And this is exactly what the Jews who created Jesus have always wanted Jesus to be. (By the way, when it comes to the Jews’ relationship to Jesus, never underestimate the Jews’ ability to dissemble and deceive.) In fact, it has become my honest opinion that Jesus Christ is not at all the Son of God, but rather the Son of the Devil, and the foremost Deceiver in all of history, just as the Jews are not the Chosen People of God, but rather the Chosen People of the Devil, and the foremost Deceivers in all of history.

[N.B. As I typed this essay, I kept typing ‘Jewsus’ rather than ‘Jesus’. I think there may be something to that…]

The Need for Good, Strong Rulers

If there’s one conclusion that needs to be drawn about human beings in general, it’s that they will never learn. As long as human beings continue to seek the lovely, pleasant and wonderful ways that enthrall them, and to disregard the right, real and true ways that they don’t like, they constantly get themselves into all kinds of nonsense and trouble. The more human beings strive for the lovely, the pleasant and the wonderful, the more every conceivable ill, error and wrong eventually results. And yet, they just don’t get it; if they recognize it at all, they tend to think that it’s normal and natural that so much that they do leads to some kind of evil sooner or later (“it’s all good”).

The guiding idea of modern liberal democracy is that human beings should be allowed to freely abandon themselves to every decadent activity, every degenerate ideal and every diseased tendency. For this reason, the very purpose of modern liberal democracy is to gradually undermine the order and structure of society (especially by eradicating everything that is of a genuinely traditional nature) in order to maximize freedom. The result of this must necessarily be the reduction of everything in society to the lowest common denominator, which will necessarily bring about the destruction of civilization sooner or later. This may seem like an exaggerated or alarmist claim to most people, but to the few who truly understand how things really work in natural reality, the eventual consequences of all of the current trends in this modern world are obvious and undeniable.

(Another important thing to consider is the fact that business is really the single most important thing in modern liberal democracy. This doesn’t mean that business is wrong or bad, but many serious problems in society are obviously the result of business trumping moral and ethical considerations. Any order and structure that is retained in modern liberal society serves only to preserve and to increase the generation of revenue. As long as the money flows, anything goes.)

The preservation of a properly ordered and civilized society is why human beings need good, strong rulers, no matter how much they may not want them. Obviously, there is no such thing as a good, strong ruler in modern liberal democracy. Almost every leader in this modern world is really an evil, weak ruler rather than a good, strong ruler, including “Barack Obama” in the USA, Justin Trudeau in Canada, David Cameron in the UK, François Hollande in France and Angela Merkel in Germany. Even the Pinko Pope Francis is an evil, weak ruler (in fact, especially so).

All of the evil, weak rulers of this modern world consistently encourage people to embrace the illusions, deceptions and lies that promise them paradise but that ultimately create tragedy, devastation and chaos. By constantly promoting everyone’s favorite sentiments such as love, tolerance and hope, the evil, weak rulers of this modern world routinely set the people up to fall into all of their traps. As I’ve written before, all of this is essentially the triumph of the teachings of Jesus Christ and of the Christian religion.

Exceptions to this are Vladimir Putin in Russia, Bashar al-Assad in Syria and Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines. These three among others seem to be exactly the kind of good, strong ruler that human beings really need to keep them from getting themselves into every possible form of insanity, deviance and perversion. Such good, strong rulers are not afraid to insist on that which is right, real and true for the genuine welfare of their subjects, even despite their misguided wishes and desires. And this is precisely the reason why these three rulers and others like them are so greatly hated by the modern liberal democratic powers.

The foremost example of a good, strong ruler who defied the fraudulent evil of modern liberal democracy by making everything right under his rule is Adolf Hitler. This is why the forces of modern liberal democracy (the Americans and British) in association with their Communist partners (the Soviet Russians) did everything possible to annihilate Adolf Hitler, the National Socialist Party and the Third Reich. All of the propaganda lies against Hitler, the Nazis and the Third Reich that have been incessantly produced to this very day (including the Holocaust™ fabrication) are intended to demonize all good, strong rulers. Although all of this may not always keep good, strong rulers from gaining power, it at least ensures that they will be universally vilified by all lovers of modern liberal democracy.

What this world really needs is for good, strong rulers to take power in most (if not all) modern liberal democratic states, and to put an end once and for all to the deceptive fraud which is modern liberal democracy as well as the Christian religion that fundamentally enables it. By the way, leaders like Nigel Farage in the UK (who recently retired after the pseudo-victory of Brexit), Marine Le Pen in France and Norbert Hofer in Austria aren’t exactly the good, strong ruler type, and I have serious doubts about the true motivations of Donald Trump. (In fact, I have my doubts about Vladimir Putin too.) Most apparent opponents of the prevailing liberal democratic regimes in this modern world are not at all opposed to modern liberal democracy and are not genuinely of the good, strong ruler type. They are all essentially controlled opposition, merely puppets of modern liberal democracy.

Honestly, I don’t even believe that it’s actually possible for genuinely good, strong rulers to take power in this modern world. The forces of modern liberal democracy really do control everything, even their apparent opposition. It seems quite likely to me that things can’t truly get better until they finish getting worse, and we’re not even close to seeing the worst yet. So I’m not holding my breath. In the meantime, I’ll just keep watching all of the believing fools who glorify those puppets who pose as their saviors, and reminding myself that human beings will simply never learn.



More on Christianity

In my previous articles, I spoke about the fact that attacks on Christianity are essentially attacks on European Tradition. This is due to the fact that Traditional European Christianity is the vehicle through which European Tradition has historically maintained itself among European peoples.

Nevertheless, there are indeed many instances when the fundamental elements of Christianity themselves, including the Jesus Christ character, are directly targeted. Such attacks clearly directed at the heart of the Christian Gospel would seem to have nothing to do with European Tradition. But in fact, they do.

In one of my previous articles, I referred to Christianity as being like a Trojan Horse for the White Race. It could just as well be thought of as controlled opposition for the enemies of the White Race.

When someone attacks someone else’s strongly held cherished belief, that someone else will usually react by holding on even more strongly to their cherished belief. When someone attacks the core of the Christian Gospel, it usually serves to strengthen the faith of the devout Christian. The more Christianity is persecuted, the more devout Christians will cling to it. There are ample demonstrations of this in the first few centuries of the Christian movement.

Concerning the Jesus Christ character, the more a leader is targeted by his opponents, the more that leader gains legitimacy among his faithful followers. By denigrating and slandering the Jesus Christ character, his enemies guarantee that his faithful followers will fully believe in him, and will thus do everything that he requires them to do exactly as he told them to do.

The enemies of the White Race understand all of this completely, and this is precisely why they love to attack Christianity (or to encourage others to attack it). They know that their attacks on Christianity will practically guarantee that devout Christians will remain devout Christians, which means that they will remain devoutly enthralled to the Christian Gospel and will therefore fail to properly acknowledge their own European Tradition. In this way, attacks on Christianity itself are indirect actions against European Tradition.

One weapon used to attack Christianity is modern rationalistic scientism, which is the liberal promotion of rational science as a quasi-religion. Over the past few centuries, rationalistic scientism has waged a constant campaign against Christianity. It is no coincidence that the rise of rationalistic scientism has been paralleled by a resurgence of the original Christianity of the Gospel (i.e. Primitive Christianity). As a result, there has been a division of most White people in modern times into partisans of either rationalistic scientism or the original Christianity of the Gospel, both of which are in favor of modern liberal values such as tolerance, multiculturalism and globalism. In the process, the non-Christian European Tradition which properly belongs to White people has been increasingly disregarded and forsaken.

As I’ve mentioned before, the Christian Gospel is exactly the opposite of what White people need to defend and maintain themselves against all of their enemies. The teachings of the Christian Gospel are precisely designed to keep White people from fighting their enemies in any real way. The Christian Gospel would have White people remaining forever meek and mild, always turning the other cheek, obeying all authorities because they are appointed by God (Romans 13), persevering faithfully through all hardships and woes, enduring all persecution and tribulation with hope for their salvation from on high, until their very extinction.

European Tradition and Christianity

In my previous article, “Two Paganisms, Two Christianities”, I used the term “Paganism” for the religious traditions of our White European ancestors. In this article, I will drop the term “Paganism” (which necessarily does have derogatory connotations) in favor of “European Tradition”. “European Tradition” is a much more accurate and appropriate term because it clearly includes the values and beliefs which our White European ancestors truly held and excludes everything that was not actually found among them.

As I have mentioned before, it is a terrible shame that many racially-aware Whites today confuse European Tradition and Christianity. Pro-Christian racially-aware Whites fail to realize that most of the values and beliefs that they hold dear are really the values and beliefs of European Tradition and not Christian values and beliefs at all. They simply don’t understand how much they still retain the values and beliefs of their own pre-Christian European ancestors, and sadly enough, they are inclined to reject this very thought altogether.

(On the other hand, there are also many racially-aware Whites who generally attribute genuinely good values such as ethical holiness and moral righteousness exclusively to Christianity, and who therefore generally reject such good values. These anti-Christian racially-aware Whites consequently buy wholeheartedly into the Christian stereotype of the “Pagan” as an extremely vile, brutish and horrible type of demonic being.)

Whenever the enemies of the White Race attack Christianity, it is not Christianity per se that they are attacking. The enemies of the White Race – including the Jews above all – know perfectly well that the Christian Gospel (i.e. the Gospel of Primitive Christianity) is not a problem for them at all, but rather a blessing for them because it teaches people to be meek and mild (i.e. obedient and submissive), to turn the other cheek, and to trust God to save them from everything (if he wants, that is). (Perhaps the Jewish origin of Christianity should be reiterated here…) Whenever the enemies of the White Race attack Christianity, what they are really attacking is the European Tradition that Europeans have continued to hold under the name “Christianity”, and even despite the Christian Gospel.

The survival of elements of European Tradition throughout European history is well known and well documented. Historians of European culture know quite well how much European Tradition survived among the European peoples after the introduction of Christianity. Among the numerous examples of this are the use of Christmas trees and the celebration of May Day, as well as the establishment of Christian places of worship (churches and shrines) on the exact locations where Traditional Europeans had always worshipped, and the identification of some of the deities of European Tradition with Christian angels and saints (e.g. St. Michael continuing the Celtic Lugus under a different name).

It is understood by many that Christianity assimilated many elements of European Tradition in order to make Christianity acceptable to European folks. This does seem to be what happened on the surface. But the way I see it, what really happened was nothing less than the attribution of the Christian name to a largely uninterrupted European Tradition. This was accompanied by a subordination of the Primitive Christian Gospel – the fundamental essence of Christianity – to the renamed European Tradition. There was no real transformation from European Tradition to Traditional European “Christianity”; it was nothing more than a nominal and superficial change.

One remarkable instance of the survival of European Tradition in Medieval Europe is the division of the people into three classes: the Priests, the Nobles and the Peasants. The institution of the Estates General of medieval France clearly displays this aspect of European Tradition. This division of the people is the exact continuation of the prehistoric Indo-European division of the people into three classes as demonstrated by French researcher Georges Dumézil (the “trifunctional hypothesis”).


Perhaps nowhere is the discrepancy between European Tradition and Christianity greater than in the history of war in Europe. All of the victories of European peoples against foreign (mostly Islamic) invaders and occupiers are routinely credited to their Christian faith. This is simply and blatantly false. The will of the European peoples throughout history to defend and to protect themselves and their own from foreign invaders can’t possibly be due to the Christian faith. It is quite patently due to the survival of European Tradition.

If King Clovis of the Franks really did call on the Christian God to help him win his battle against the Alamanni around 496 AD (the story is possibly an invention by Gregory of Tours), it was certainly not because of the Christian Gospel at all. King Clovis’ acceptance of the God of Christianity is a clear indication that this God was already quite fully assimilated to the traditional European conception of a Supreme God like Zeus, Jupiter or Odin, rather than a God of Love, Guilt and Damnation like the God of the Christian Gospel.

Charles Martel and his Frankish warriors were not motivated by the Christian Gospel when they fought and defeated an Islamic invasion force near Poitiers in 732 AD. That which motivated them was obviously the retention of European Tradition, particularly in its warrior aspects. And the same goes for every engagement in which Europeans fought against non-European enemies (and also against other Europeans, unfortunately).

If one doubts this, one should seriously consider the substance and import of the Christian Gospel and ask oneself if it ever could have encouraged anyone to defend themselves against anything at all. The fact of the matter is that the Christian Gospel is practically opposed to the very concept of defending and protecting oneself against threats, whether militarily or otherwise, and this is clearly a fundamental element in the Christian Gospel. Whoever might actually believe otherwise certainly doesn’t know what the Christian Gospel is at all.

In modern times, the practically insane thinking of the Christian Gospel is brilliantly reflected in the statement by one of the most idiotic leaders in world history: “If you kill your enemies, they win”. Quite obviously, the almost total lack of opposition to the steady flooding of European countries with hordes of non-Whites in recent years has everything to do with the resurgence in modern times of values and beliefs that come straight from the Christian Gospel and with a concomitant disintegration and disappearance of European Tradition.

A clear indication of the resurgence of the Gospel of Primitive Christianity in modern times is the Pinko Pope Francis, whose messages of love, tolerance and pathological altruism are the result of an exact and perfectly faithful interpretation of the teachings of the Christian Gospel. For over a millennium, the Roman Catholic Church was the bastion of Traditional European “Christianity”, but that is obviously no longer the case. During the past half-century or so (more or less since Vatican II), the Roman Catholic Church has actively endeavored to eradicate every trace of European Tradition both within itself and without, and has wholeheartedly embraced the true Christian Gospel.


Like the successes of European armies in warfare, the intellectual developments of European history were in no way due to Christianity. The Christian Gospel consistently emphasizes mystical “spirituality” while denigrating genuine wisdom (“For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God’s sight” 1 Corinthians 3:19). Christianity is fundamentally a mystical religion, and all mysticism has always been opposed to intelligent reason. Among other things, the Christian disdain for intelligence and reason is clearly reflected in the pathological Christian obsession for the miraculous (see the “Venerable” Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People, for a particularly mind-boggling example).

None of the advances of European science and technology would ever have been possible if Europe had truly been Christian. Although Aristotle and other Greek thinkers are usually credited as the Fathers of European Science, it was European Tradition generally that always compelled Europeans to learn and to know more and more, and to build and create ever more excellent things. The evidence for remarkable ingenuity and creativity among the ancient Celtic and Germanic folks is certainly not lacking (read The Celts by Peter Berresford Ellis).

It is interesting to note that Thomas Aquinas never could finish his work synthesizing Christian belief with intellectual philosophy – the Summa Theologica. Perhaps the real reason for this is that he finally recognized that his attempt to reconcile a mystical faith with genuine reason was profoundly illusory and necessarily deceptive.


The Jesus character of the Christian Gospel is clearly a Social Justice Warrior. Like all modern SJW’s, the Jesus character is clearly depicted as being on the side of all of the worst elements of society. The Jesus character is the friend of deviants and degenerates, including whores and thieves. He is always willing to defend and to justify people of questionable character (“Whoever is without sin among you, let him be the first to cast a stone at her” John 8:7) and guarantees forgiveness for anyone. As the staunch ally of all of the less reputable elements of society, the Jesus character is also the sworn enemy of all of the best elements of society.

By pointing out that the Jesus character is depicted as being a friend of deviants and degenerates, I am not necessarily suggesting that Christianity encourages deviant and degenerate behavior (although it is no secret that religions like Christianity and Islam which are practically founded on guilt, shame and resentment will often foster secret tendencies towards deviance and perversion). What I am suggesting is that Christianity capitalizes on the bad feelings of deviants and degenerates (shame, guilt, envy, resentment, etc.) in order to turn them against all the better elements of society. This is precisely what modern Leftists do: win over all of the disadvantaged and disaffected scum of the earth in order to sic them on the better folks.

From the fourth century onwards, the Jesus character underwent a radical transformation. He tended to be seen less and less as a meek and mild preacher who loved sinners and more and more as a strong conquering hero. This clearly paralleled the subordination of the Christian Gospel to European Tradition. The process of evangelizing the “pagan” Germanic folks contributed greatly to this transformation: in the Old Saxon Hêliand, Jesus is depicted as a Germanic warlord (a drohtin). The Jesus of the Middle Ages was much closer to the traditional European idea of a Divine Lord like Lugus (Lugh) of the Celts than to the oh-so-lovable Jesus of the Christian Gospel.


European Tradition has always worked for the benefit of European folks. This is the very reason why it was retained throughout the Middle Ages despite the introduction of Christianity. If the Primitive Christianity of the Gospel had really become the religion of Europe during the first centuries AD, it certainly would have meant the total ruin of Europe, and it would have meant the extinction of the European peoples long before today, whether by the swords of the Huns in the fifth century, or those of the Muslims in the 8th century, or those of the Mongols in the 13th century, or those of the Ottoman Turks in the 16th century. Note well what is happening to the European peoples now, and recognize that it is due to the widespread adoption of the values and beliefs of the Christian Gospel in modern times (thanks to the Jews, of course).

The question may well be asked: “If European Tradition was everything that our European ancestors needed, why did they adopt Christianity at all, even if only nominally?” One possible answer, at least as far as the common folks are concerned, is that they were enticed with the false promise of salvation and/or coerced with the equally false threat of damnation. Another possible answer – which may well be related to the previous answer – is that some unscrupulous European leaders understood the potential value of Christianity as an “opiate of the masses”. Of course, there were also instances of Christianity being imposed by force, as Charlemagne did to the Saxons between 772 and 804, and as was done to the Baltic peoples a few centuries later during the “Northern Crusades”.

There is truly no good reason for a racially-aware White European to cling to any kind of Christianity. There is nothing whatsoever in the Christian Gospel which is truly beneficial for White European folks and a lot that is clearly detrimental to White European folks (such as the pathological altruism which patently allows for White Genocide). I honestly believe that all racially-aware White Europeans should embrace the European Tradition that truly belongs to them and reject everything that does not truly belong to European Tradition. This is the only way to bring about the genuine unity of all White Europeans against their common enemies.

Two Paganisms, Two Christianities

The age-old conflict between Christianity and Paganism has been a hotly-debated issue among racially-aware Whites, causing numerous heated arguments on many Pro-White websites. Many moderators of Pro-White websites have virtually banned religious discussion due to the fact that it seems to be impossible to resolve the religious issue.

Pro-White Christians assert that their religion is the only true religion for the White Race and that White people can only fall into every ill, evil and wrong without it, while Pro-White Pagans insist that the only form of religion that truly suits White people is their own ancestral religious tradition.

A big problem with this whole debate is that there are distinctions that must be made between two radically different kinds of Paganism and between two radically different kinds of Christianity.

Two Paganisms

First, it should be said that the term “Paganism” was first used in a derogatory sense by Christians to lump together all religions except for Christianity since Christians believed their own religion to be the only true religion (of course, exceptions were made for Judaism). This view is a direct continuation of the way Jews viewed their own religion, and Muslims also have the same view about their own religion.

The three Abrahamic religions – Judaism, Christianity and Islam – are closely related, particularly in being the only major religions to claim to be the only true religions. Because of their inherent exceptionalism, these three religions routinely display an obsessive hatred of all religions apart from their own and a deep-seated desire to annihilate all other religions (although only two of these religions have historically been open about it).

For these reasons, it is convenient to isolate these three religions as a distinct group apart from all other religions. Therefore, the term Paganism is useful to distinguish all non-Abrahamic religions from the three highly idiosyncratic Abrahamic religions.

(For a very interesting discussion of the Abrahamic religions, see Chapter 3 “Opposition to the Natural Way” of The Dharma Manifesto by Śri Dharma Pravartaka Ācharya.)

As I explained in my article entitled “What is Paganism?”, there is a big difference between the original Paganism of the tribal peoples of Europe and the civilized Paganism of the Greek and Roman Civilizations.

Although they were not fully civilized like the Greeks and the Romans, the tribal peoples of Europe (such as the Celtic and Germanic peoples) did have advanced cultures that were well-organized and relatively sophisticated. Tacitus in his Germania implicitly contrasts the laudable elements of Germanic society with the obviously despicable elements of the Roman society of his day. And an enlightened Roman like Cicero knew well enough that the Celtic Druids were not lacking in understanding and wisdom.

The Paganism found in these advanced tribal cultures was an honest and real religion. There was no place for deviance, debauchery and perversion in Pagan societies. Morality and ethics were most highly placed ideals. This certainly does not mean that the Pagans were inhibited like Christians, but it does mean that Pagans despised everything that was clearly abnormal and unnatural, including all deviance and perversion. Pagans were generally satisfied with enjoying normal indulgences naturally.

Two factors have historically clouded our view of the Paganism of our tribal European ancestors. First, some Roman propagandists were not averse to distorting information, or even inventing information, about the tribal peoples of Europe in order to disparage them. And it often happened that the only real contact that the Greeks and Romans had with tribal peoples was through their warriors. Warriors of any nation always have a natural tendency to be particularly uninhibited and usually tend to be somewhat peripheral to their societies; this is just a natural fact of being a warrior. But it was often assumed that the ways and mores of these warriors were representative of those of their entire societies.

In Oswald Spengler’s view (The Decline of the West), the beginning of a full-fledged civilization represents the end of a culture’s development. According to this view, from the time that a culture transitions into a civilization, its cultural (qualitative) development will – if it does not cease altogether – diminish in inverse proportion to the increase in its material (quantitative) development. This means that for as long as a civilization endures, it also inevitably declines culturally and spiritually to some extent, and this leads to the emergence and growth of countless ills, errors and wrongs.

All civilizations have a tendency to overextend themselves. This is seen especially in the singularly extensive conquests of Alexander the Great (who may be seen as a real life manifestation of Icarus and Phaethon of Greek myth). It was also the case with the Romans after they overcame Carthage as a result of the Punic Wars. In the modern period, it is seen with the era of immoderate Western imperialism during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries (as opposed to the moderate colonization that had preceded this).

The Greek and Roman Civilizations that flourished so grandly on material levels also steadily declined in terms of culture and spirituality. Even before theses civilizations attained their zeniths, they had started to become decadent and corrupt, and as they waxed ever more greatly, their citizens became more and more demoralized, debauched and perverted. Like modern Western Civilization, these advanced civilizations of antiquity were increasingly liberal, hedonistic and multicultural.

Because of the undeniable cultural and spiritual decline of the Greek and Roman Civilizations, the once-healthy Paganism of the ancestors of the civilized Greeks and Romans rapidly became a degenerate and perverse Paganism. This is seen in many elements of Greco-Roman Paganism, such as the Roman Bacchanalia festival. And it explains why the Gods and Goddesses of the Greeks and Romans were portrayed as somewhat foolish beings indulging in various questionable deeds and behaviors.

The increasingly degenerate and perverse nature of Paganism encouraged many in the Greek and Roman Civilizations to turn to mystery cults, many of which originated in decadent Middle Eastern regions (such as Phrygia). The mystery cults of antiquity can be compared to modern deviant subcultures such as the homosexual subculture and the rave subculture. Mystery cults such as the Dionysian Mysteries first appeared in Greece; they subsequently appeared in Rome after the Roman Conquest of Greece in the second century BC. The growth of increasingly uninhibited mystery cults prompted reactions against their excesses and evils, including legislative attempts at restricting the mystery cults, or rational philosophies like Stoicism. Ultimately, Christianity appeared from this confused mess as an essentially anti-mystery-cult mystery cult i.e. an extremely inhibited mystery cult that opposed the extremely uninhibited nature of other mystery cults.

Unfortunately, this distorted and diseased Paganism with its mystery cults is the kind of Paganism that has always informed the classic Christian view of all Paganism. Christians have consistently refused to consider the healthy and normal Paganism of the tribal Europeans on its own merits. Since the beginning and to this day, the Christians have always insisted on viewing all non-Christian religions through the lens of the sick and twisted Greco-Roman Paganism.

[In a recent post on the Council of European Canadians website (, the “Rev. Russell Haynes” (lmao) expressed his belief that the modern evil of Multiculturalism is due to a resurgence of Paganism in association with Globalism and Cultural Marxism. He would have been right if he had specified “degenerate Greco-Roman Paganism”.]

Two Christianities

Primitive Christianity arose as a consequence of the shame, guilt and resentment of its earliest members, all of whom were disaffected Jews. The very essence of the Primitive Christian movement was an attempt to transform the shame, guilt and resentment of its practitioners into a form of redeeming spirituality, particularly through various kinds of mystical escapism and self-denial.

From the very beginning, Christianity was a movement intended to empower all pathetic, contemptible and inferior people. It was the religion of resentment par excellence against all who are truly noble, virtuous and superior.

Christianity was designed to attract all of the weak, the sick and the stupid by making them believe that their weakness, their sickness and their stupidity were blessings, and that God loved them and favored them because of their weakness, their sickness and their stupidity.

Christianity thus turned weakness, sickness and stupidity into practically virtuous attributes while redefining real strength, health and intelligence as essentially evil. At the same time, the weak, the sick and the stupid were practically guaranteed salvation and eternal life, while the strong, the healthy and the intelligent were generally considered damned and hell-bound.

The more a people are demoralized, the more they will tend to accept and embrace a foreign religion that differs from their own ancestral religion. This was the case in later Roman times, when Primitive Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire. It has also been the case in modern times, with the spread of Modernism.

The redemptive guise of Primitive Christianity made it very popular with the demoralized and disadvantaged masses of the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire was full of pathetic, contemptible and inferior people. There was certainly no shortage of such types who would be drawn to the Good News of salvation for the weak, the sick and the stupid. This explains the relatively rapid spread of Primitive Christianity among the masses. And as the higher classes became increasingly demoralized with the continued decay and decline of the Roman Empire, they too found Primitive Christianity increasingly acceptable.

There were also many cunning philosophers in the Roman Empire who profoundly despised the time-honored traditions of the Ancient World and who were only too keen to use their intellectual sophistry in the service of a religion that aimed to subvert the traditions of the Ancient World. These shrewd proponents of mystical delusion became what are called the Christian “Church Fathers”.

There have been some thinkers who believed that the spread and growth of Christianity was the principal cause of the decline of the Roman Empire. In fact, the spread and growth of Christianity was facilitated by the decline of the Roman Empire. As the Roman Empire became increasingly decadent, its growing weakness allowed the rapid infection of the Christian pathology to spread and eventually to flourish. If anything, Christianity only accelerated the already occurring process of the decline of the Roman Empire.

Yet, at the same time, the gradual adoption of Christianity by the Roman upper classes and its eventual legalization caused a significant degree of transformation in Christianity. Certainly by the time it became the official Roman state religion (in 392 AD), Christianity was no longer only an expression of the resentment of the weak, the sick and the stupid.

When it became the official Roman religion, Christianity necessarily accommodated the strong, the healthy and the intelligent, while also keeping the Gospel of the weak, the sick and the stupid to keep the masses content. This is how what had been Primitive Christianity was radically transformed into Traditional European Christianity.

Late Roman Christianity was further transformed in this direction in early medieval times when it incorporated the Germanic peoples into its fold. The proud Germanic peoples still had strong and healthy noble classes who could never be inclined to tolerate a morality based on the resentment of weak, sick and stupid people.

(On the transformation from Primitive Christianity to Traditional European Christianity, I highly recommend The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity by James C. Russell.)

The Traditional European Christianity that existed from Late Roman to Early Modern times may be described as a synthesis of the original Gospel of the weak, the sick and the stupid with the superior moral systems of the Romans and of the Germanic peoples. The former religion remained as a succor for all of the pathetic, contemptible and inferior peasants within Christendom, while the latter was indispensable for the noble classes.

Traditional European Christianity suited the White European peoples inasmuch as it corresponded with the Traditional European values found in the Pagan Religions of their pre-Christian tribal ancestors. Fortunately, it was the Traditional European elements in Traditional European Christianity which generally prevailed over the Primitive Christian elements that were retained. But the Primitive Christian elements could potentially always serve as a means to undermine Traditional European Christianity.

The Reformation in the 16th century represents the beginning of a resurgence of the original Christian Gospel of the weak, the sick and the stupid against the Traditional European values of the strong, the healthy and intelligent. The typically Protestant obsession with returning to the original values of Primitive Christianity is an expression of the desire of resentful people to restore the Gospel of the weak, the sick and the stupid and to eliminate the superior morality of the noble classes.

This resurgence of the original Christian Gospel influenced the Enlightenment, which eventually led to the French Revolution, this being the greatest single outbreak of anti-traditionalism in all of human history. Since then, the views and values of Primitive Christianity have increasingly prevailed in modern society. Every revolution from the French Revolution of 1789 through the Russian Revolution of 1917 to the NGO-sponsored color revolutions of recent years has been derived from the sore feelings of the disaffected and disadvantaged and has contributed to the growth and expansion of Modern Liberalism.

Modern Liberalism corresponds largely to a secular version of Primitive Christianity. Like Primitive Christianity, Modern Liberalism is based on an attempt to mitigate feelings of shame, guilt and resentment. The Primitive Christian origins of Modern Liberal values such as egalitarianism, tolerance, multiculturalism and globalism are plainly obvious (see Matthew 28:19 and Galatians 3:28). Modern Liberalism is truly the victory of Primitive Christianity.


Of the two forms of Paganism described above, the tribal Paganism of our pre-Roman and pre-Christian European ancestors is clearly the favorable one. Only modern deviants and degenerates who falsely claim to be Pagan could look with favor on the debauchery and perversion of Greco-Roman Paganism.

Of the two forms of Christianity, Traditional European Christianity is preferable inasmuch as it largely represents a continuation of pre-Christian European values even despite its retention of Primitive Christian elements. But it is and always has been compromised by these Primitive Christian elements.

Christianity truly is like a Trojan Horse for the White Race. It is my opinion that Christianity must be rejected altogether by racially-aware White people. Nothing that belongs particularly to Christianity is truly beneficial to the White Race. Everything in Christianity that is particularly Christian is favorable to all the worst kinds of people, and is therefore detrimental to the White Race, not to mention the fact that it is derived from Jewish thinking and is therefore especially favorable to the Jews.

The fact that Christianity is of Jewish origin should never be ignored or minimized. No one should ever dismiss the fact that the Christian Old Testament is the Jewish Bible. No one should ever deny the fact that all of the important (fictional) characters in the Christian New Testament are Jewish (as followers of Christian Identity actually do). The Jewish origin of Christianity is crucial to properly understanding the original nature and purpose of Christianity. Whether or not they recognize it, all who call themselves Christians are serving the Jewish agenda.

In my view, racially-aware Whites who cling to Christianity simply don’t properly understand what they’re clinging to. It’s quite understandable that they wish to retain something which they consider to be of crucial importance to their spiritual wellbeing. But what they fail to realize is that the values of the Traditional Christianity that they cherish so much are not specifically Christian values. In fact, they are either primarily Traditional European values or exclusively Traditional European values. It is a great shame that Traditional European values have been so thoroughly associated with the Christian name that people fail to recognize their true non-Christian origin.

The only religion that truly suits us as White people is the Traditional European religion of our tribal Pagan ancestors. Traditional European religion is the only religion that fully celebrates strength, health, beauty and intelligence and that fully encourages us to embrace these without shame, without guilt and without resentment. Traditional European religion is the only religion that can foster genuine morality, genuine ethics and genuine understanding in us. Traditional European religion is the only religion that will give us a proper sense of justice, a proper sense of honor and a proper sense of pride. And it is my contention that only Traditional European religion can save the White Race from the extinction that currently threatens it.

About the Christian Essence of Modernity

It is interesting to observe how modern Christians are aligned with modern secular society. This alignment is due to the resurgence of primitive Christian views and values during the Enlightenment. Especially since the French Revolution, the primitive Christian obsession with love, compassion and tolerance has gradually prevailed over all of modern society.

The only real differences in the views and values of modern Christians and modern secular people have to do with that which is irrelevant, unimportant or imaginary (e.g. believing in Jesus Christ). Modern Christians and modern secular people tend to have the same views and values when it comes to the obvious, the immediate and the concrete, and both groups tend to be ignorant of the true nature of ills, errors and wrongs which are beyond their limited perceptual grasp.

Both modern Christians and modern secular folks agree that hate is always wrong and that love is always right. They both firmly believe that everything which is lovely, wonderful and pleasant is to be embraced wholeheartedly, and that everything which is not lovely, wonderful and pleasant should not exist. They are both convinced that the principal measures of value should always be sentiments and desires such as happiness, pleasure and love. Such views represent one of the greatest deceptions in all of human history.

One may wonder at the prevalence of Christian views and values in a modern secular society, especially considering the historical opposition between modern secular society and Christianity. The fact of the matter is that the traditional European Christianity that existed from the late Roman Empire to early modern times had an entirely different nature from the original primitive Christianity.

Traditional European Christianity was (even despite its mystical excesses) an intellectual spirituality that maintained the right and opposed the wrong, whereas the emphasis in primitive Christianity (even despite its intellectual sophistry) had been on a sentimental spirituality desiring the good and loathing the bad. Traditional European Christianity valued order, justice and righteousness above all; the principal values of primitive Christianity had been love, compassion and tolerance. Primitive Christianity had been a religion of resentment and envy designed to suit miserable outcasts and rejects; traditional European Christianity was a religion of authority and order intended to produce a truly better and higher society.

Modern secular society has never opposed primitive Christian views and values. What it has consistently attacked is traditional European Christianity.

It should be noted that those vile Femen sluts will attack traditional European Churches, such as the Roman Catholic and Russian Orthodox Churches, but never the more open and liberal modern churches.

It is truly a sign of the times that the great bastion of traditional European Christianity, the Roman Catholic Church, has now been entirely subverted by the views and values of primitive Christianity. The Papacy of Pope Francis is a clear indication that the aims of Vatican II have been fully achieved, and that the Roman Catholic Church no longer represents traditional European Christianity.


General Overview of the Political Program for the White National State of Midland

This political program for the White National State of Midland is intended for the establishment, maintenance and defense of a properly constituted society which strives towards traditional higher values such as righteousness, virtue and honor rather than the inferior values of modern progressive liberalism such as tolerance, mediocrity and charity. Such misguided sentimental values as unconditional forgiveness, universal compassion and unbounded love which encourage dissolution, decadence and deviance will be strongly and consistently opposed.

The White National State of Midland will uphold the Superior Tradition (spiritual and intellectual) that has characterized all truly great Civilizations rather than the mediocre tradition (sentimental and materialistic) that typifies the degenerate and vainglorious monstrosity which is modern civilization.

The White National State of Midland will constantly strive to maintain a higher order for its Citizens based on the higher values that it promotes, and will thus make every effort to curb and to minimize (if not completely eliminate) all dysfunction, disorder and disease among its Citizens. In this way, the White National State of Midland will make sure that the better elements of its society are fully empowered to achieve their best without being forced to accommodate artificially propped-up inferior individuals.

The White National State of Midland will make sure that it will no longer be possible for degenerates, deviants and deceivers to freely publicize and propagate their ills, evils and wrongs. No effort will be spared in the relentless campaign to exterminate all wickedness, vileness and madness as much as possible throughout the White National State of Midland.

The White National State of Midland will put an end to the era of incessant progressive liberal revolution that has increasingly characterized the Modern Age beginning with the French Revolution. It will be recognized that the Modern Age has essentially consisted of a constant state of social and moral upheaval that has worked to undermine, overthrow and destroy everything that belongs to a Higher Traditional Order.

Multiculturalism as well as religious and linguistic diversity will not be tolerated in the White National State of Midland. The White National State of Midland will recognize the diversity of races and ethnic groups in the world and will agree that every distinct people should live in a land of its own, but the modern notion of racial and ethnic diversity within a state will be fully opposed. The Citizens of the White National State of Midland will constitute one genuinely unified nation belonging to one race (the White Race), speaking one national language (the English language), sharing one national culture (European culture) and embracing one national religion (New Aryanism).

A concerted effort to obliterate the demented liberal mentality of modern civilization will be undertaken, even inasmuch as it may require the elimination of a significant portion of the population, so that all of the ills, errors and wrongs of modern society may be definitively terminated.

One of the foundational ideas of the White National State of Midland will be the traditional will to spiritual growth rather than the modernist lust for material progress, the former essentially being a qualitative and vertical objective and the latter essentially being a quantitative and horizontal objective.

The White National State of Midland will promote genuine benefit over material profit, genuine justice over sentimental idealism, and genuine wellness over immoderate prosperity. That which is truly best for the Citizens will be the foremost concern of the White National State of Midland.

The White National State of Midland will advocate genuine strength over weakness, genuine health over disease, genuine beauty over ugliness and genuine intelligence over stupidity. No longer will the weak, the diseased, the ugly and the stupid receive any undue favor from the system.

In many respects, the White National State of Midland will resemble the German Third Reich. National Socialism will be a foremost influence on the elaboration of the White National State of Midland. Yet, the White National State of Midland will not slavishly follow the Third Reich or National Socialism in all respects.

Other significant influences for the White National State of Midland will be Plato’s Republic, the Hindu Dharmashastra and Guillaume Faye’s Archeofuturism.


After having ruled over the Uindonian nation for 24 years, King Robert called together an assembly of the Holy and Noble Ones of the Uindonian nation in order to speak to them. Once the Holy and Noble Ones had assembled before him, King Robert stood up and began to speak. Thus spoke King Robert:

“Since the death of my father King William over 24 years ago, I have ruled over this Uindonian nation as its King. During this time, I have had the privilege of overseeing the ever-increasing greatness of this Uindonian nation, and I rejoice in it.

“Our young warriors are brave, proud and strong. There is not one among them who is cowardly, weak or lazy. They are not afraid of battle; indeed, they relish the righteous struggle of warfare. No one will ever defeat them as long as they remain brave, proud and strong.

“A good number of our young warriors have died the best kind of death on the battlefields. For the glory of our holy nation, they were not averse to dying gloriously in battle against our enemies. We must remember them forever with thanks. And we know that their holy souls have received the most excellent rewards for their self-sacrifice.

“During the reign of my father King William and during my own reign, we have repeatedly defeated all of our enemies. Now all of the vile children of darkness are subdued. We did not ask them to submit to us. We did not negotiate with them. We attacked them without mercy and we utterly destroyed their power. We beat them into submission and reduced them to nothing. By our righteous might, we overcame them all.

“King William, my holy father, taught me that we should be good with our families, honest with our friends and decent with our allies, but that we should never hesitate to chastise our enemies as they deserve. We must necessarily have enemies, for this is the reality of natural existence. Let us never be slow to treat our enemies as such so that our glorious nation will always remain a glorious nation.

“Our glorious and noble nation is the fruit of virtuous men and holy women. We are the result of the best breeding, the manifestation of the excellence of our ancestors. Our noble ancestors did not allow our nation to be compromised by sick, perverse and degenerate elements. It is for the greater glory of our nation that they mercilessly eliminated the morally degenerate and the psychologically diseased from among them so that such vermin could not infest our nation.

“By favoring the best of their progeny and by exterminating all undesirable individuals, our noble ancestors encouraged the development of a strong and healthy nation, truly the best of our race. We must continue to weed out the freaks, faggots and deviants from among us, without pity, and to make an example of them for all to see, so that our glorious nation will always remain a glorious nation.

“When the Uindonian nation began to form after the demise of the old degenerate and perverse world, the Gods looked upon the incipient Uindonian nation with favor because they saw that our most holy and noble ancestors had every intention of making sure that the Uindonian nation would become a truly holy and glorious nation. The Gods were pleased with our most holy and noble ancestors because of the righteous laws and customs that they promulgated, and the Gods honored the efforts of our most holy and noble ancestors by granting them victory and prosperity. To this day, we have kept the righteous laws and customs of our most holy and noble ancestors, and this is why we have not ceased to be the truly holy and glorious nation that our most holy and noble ancestors brought into existence through their righteous will.

“Moreover, the Gods observed the righteous campaigns of our most holy and noble ancestors against all of the peoples of other races that once lived in this land. In the old degenerate and perverse world, many different races were encouraged to mix together into a confused, multicultural mess. Along with our own ancestors, not only had the aboriginal primitives been allowed to remain, but there were also all of the foreign dark-skinned hordes that had come to infest these territories from the more uncivilized parts of the world. And let us not forget that most cunning race whose very raison-d’être was to treacherously debase and defile good righteous people in order to parasitize them.

“Through many years of constant campaigning, beginning under the reign of the very first king of the Uindonian nation, the holy King Arthur, our most holy and noble ancestors drove away all of the peoples of other races, including people of mixed race. All of the cunning vermin that could be captured have been eliminated. Thus our most holy and noble ancestors cleansed the land, and saved their nation from many troubles, and this was to the Gods’ great satisfaction. And we have continued to wage war against all peoples of other races, never allowing them to become a threat to us. Indeed, we have constantly forced the peoples of other races to retreat further and further away from us. See how glorious our nation truly is!

“Neither have we allowed the subversive ideas and nefarious concepts of vile foreigners to infest our minds, and to dissuade us from the excellent ways of our most holy and noble ancestors. As long as we continue to reject the sweet deceptions and pleasant errors of alien prophets, our nation shall forever remain a glorious nation. But if we ever compromise ourselves by adopting the ideas and concepts of contemptible weaklings and cunning demons, the glory of our nation will surely disappear.

“In the old degenerate and perverse world, seductive teachers were regularly allowed to preach their lovely diseases and pretty lies, such as equality, democracy, liberalism, tolerance and human rights, and the minds of the peoples became completely infested with every corrupt idea and diseased notion. This was the reason for the steady deterioration and decadence of the old world. Because of the wrongful ideals and erroneous values preached by wicked teachers and false prophets, the society of the old world was riddled with every conceivable form of weakness, sickness, madness and sinfulness, and crime, corruption and deception were commonplace. Thankfully, the catastrophic demise of the old degenerate and perverse world brought these ills and evils largely to an end.

“But for a brief time in the history of our own Uindonian nation, during the reign of my holy grandfather Kind Edward, the seductive teachings of error and evil resurfaced, and deceptive prophets appeared in our Holy Nation in order to debase, to debauch and ultimately to destroy us. My grandfather King Edward and the Holy and Noble Ones with him recognized these devils for what they truly were, and understood that their seductive ramblings were a grave threat to the wellbeing of our nation. Therefore, our most holy and noble ancestors did not hesitate to consign these devils to the fire, thus sending them back to Hell. Let us always be vigilant and let us never refrain from ridding ourselves of these sweet-talking devils!

“The Uindonian nation does not need a Gospel of cowards, losers and slaves, like the Christian Gospel of the old degenerate and perverse world. May the day never come when the base desires and vile dreams of inferior men and women become the guiding principles of our nation! Our glorious nation was not built up on the shameful principles of servility, humility and weakness. Our glorious nation was built up on the proud principles of holiness, righteousness and power. It is because of these superior principles that the Uindonian nation has prevailed and prospered. And we know that there is no place whatsoever among the Gods in Heaven for cowards, losers and slaves.

“You all know that in the old degenerate and perverse world, many people were supported by the government. Actually, it was called “government assistance”, but it might as well have been called “government dependence”. Many of the people who lived in dependence on government support were disabled and diseased, but then many of the so-called disabilities were largely imaginary mental conditions. In any case, many people in the old degenerate and perverse world were quick to find “acceptable reasons” to avoid working for themselves and earning their own money, although the real reason was quite often a simple case of shameful laziness. And the government obviously had no problem with giving handouts to all of those weaklings, losers and delinquents. Let us be thankful that our holy and noble ancestors had the good sense to reject and to put an end to all such “government assistance” nonsense. One of the best things our holy and noble ancestors ever did was to deal decisively with all of the vile scum that were assuming that the gravy train of so-called “government assistance” would last forever.

“Let me speak to our Holy Ones, to the priests, prophets and poets of our glorious nation. To you who have been blessed by the Gods with sacred spiritual gifts, the keeping of our Holy Tradition has been entrusted. Through your ritual incantations, through your righteous proclamations and through your holy odes, it is your responsibility to maintain and transmit the Holy Tradition of our nation as it was first formulated by our most holy and noble ancestors. You know that our most Holy Tradition should by no means be a subject of debate or of negotiation because it is the very foundation of our glory and prosperity. We trust that you will forever keep our Holy Tradition in its perfect integrity without any compromise so that because of it our nation will remain forever a glorious and prosperous nation.

“Let me also speak to the noble mothers of the Uindonian nation. See how the Gods have blessed the Uindonian nation through the strong and healthy children of holy mothers! It is the greatest gift of a woman to bear and to raise righteous children. This has always been true, and it will always be true. May the Uindonian nation always be blessed with holy and noble mothers!

“Our Holy Nation lacks nothing. We have the power to secure all of the resources that we need, we have the knowledge to transform these resources into the best products and tools, and we have the wisdom to put these products and tools to the best use. We certainly are not obsessed with mindless materialistic concerns like people were in the old degenerate and perverse world, but we have everything we need in abundance. All of our farmers, our craftsmen and our workers who provide us all with their goods and services contribute to the glory of our Uindonian nation. Let us never be lax in ensuring that the endeavors of our people are never wasted or carried out in vain. Let us profit fully from what we have gained as a result of making the Uindonian nation the glorious nation that it truly is.

“I have already praised our Holy Warriors, and our Holy Priests, Prophets and Poets. I have also praised the Noble Mothers of the Uindonian Nation, as well as our farmers, craftsmen and workers. Let me now praise the entire Uindonian nation.

“The Uindonian nation is a strong and brave nation. There is no place in the Uindonian nation for weaklings and cowards. The Uindonian nation is a righteous and holy nation. There is no place in the Uindonian nation for criminals and sinners. The Uindonian nation is a noble and free nation. There is no place in the Uindonian nation for the vile and the servile.

“Every day, I see the glowing pride of our Uindonian society. I see strong and healthy children, the fruit of a good marriage between a strong and healthy man and a strong and healthy woman, and my soul is filled with joy. I see proud workers diligently performing their tasks and I see faithful wives obtaining supplies at the market for their homes. Everywhere I see a properly ordered and properly functioning society, and I thank the Gods that I am able to witness such a blessed thing!

“I am always mindful that we must do our utmost to protect and maintain our precious Uindonian society, which necessarily means eliminating everything that does not properly belong to it. And I think about how horrible things had become in the old degenerate and perverse world, knowing that society back then had allowed itself to be gradually destroyed through various invasive elements that were foreign, different and abnormal. Let us always be thankful that our holy and noble ancestors made sure to eliminate all foreign, different and abnormal elements so that a beautiful and proud society such as this Uindonian society could come to be.

“The Uindonian nation is truly a nation blessed by the Gods. I am convinced that the Gods have never been displeased with the Uindonian nation because the Uindonian nation has always existed according to the Will of the Gods and the Ways of Nature, in war as well as in peace. Surely, the Gods have always smiled upon our righteous victories in battle as well as our prosperity and freedom. And the Gods undoubtedly approve of our steadfast devotion to the principles of power, holiness and virtue, and our constant vigilance against the evil forces of dysfunction, perversion and vice.

“The Uindonian nation is among the most glorious nations in all of human history. It is thanks to the righteous will of our most holy and noble ancestors that our Uindonian nation became a truly glorious nation. By virtue of the traditional laws and customs that our most holy and noble ancestors handed down to us, our Uindonian nation has always prospered and prevailed. Let us continue in every way to guarantee that our Uindonian nation will forever remain a most glorious nation.”

After he had pronounced these words, King Robert sat down on his throne. Then the Holy and Noble Ones who had assembled to hear him speak broke out in a deafening cheer, and they chanted “Long live King Robert!” and “Long live the Uindonian nation!” All of them agreed that nothing should ever be allowed to threaten the glory of the Uindonian nation, and that everything should be done to ensure that the Uindonian nation should forever remain a most glorious nation.